Saturday June 7
June 7th, 2008 Posted in June 2008L inda Moulton Howe has just published the testimony of a double crash followed by a recovery on May 14 in California. An object turquoise-blue glow, oval, crashed at 3 am south of Needles, near Topock, Arizona. According to a witness who was at 400 meters, a helicopter winching win came 17 minutes later, leaving in the direction of Las Vegas. The location of the incident is a hundred meters from the Colorado River. The witness, identified yet by his initials, RB, was on the bridge of his boat, on which he lives past thirty years, when he saw him fall toward a huge shiny object and incandescent. |  |
He was surprised to find that the colors emitted by the object were not yellow or orange, as in the case of a fire, but blue-turquoise with light green.
Another witness observed the phenomenon: Frank Costigan is a retiree who was Chief of Operations and the Police International Airport in Los Angeles, between 1978 and 1985. It happens sometimes to present information about the KTOX station AM 1340 of Needles. He lives about 5 miles east of the river. At 3 o'clock in the morning, it was her cat out of the house when he saw this object ignited, blue-turquoise with glowing lights, falling to Colorado. But he had no visibility on the impact site.
 | RB attended the crash: "This thing has rebounded in the air, and pieces of yellow-red stole around the body of the object. However, the noise was unexpected, rather dull. " It was in the process of composing, but without success, the emergency number on his satellite phone when he was extremely surprised to see arrive at the scene, some fifteen minutes later, a helicopter winching always carry this object Glowing who had the size of a truck. |
We knew since March 16, by his personal assistant, that the British Ambassador Sir John Sawers had not participated in meetings on the subject of UFOs to the United Nations in February. She replied, after a FOIA request: "We know that reports circulating on the Internet, that the Ambassador had attended meetings at the United Nations in February on the subject of UFOs. But I can assure you that these stories are totally unfounded. "- Sandra Coleman
The formulation of denial remained ambiguous, because the meetings were not supposed precisely to the question entitled extraterrestrial. The deadline for response to the FOIA request was extended on April 10 to allow it to be discussed further. It is Ursula Antwi-Boasiako, the Department of International Organizations, which took the following, and his answer is more elaborate: "Sir John Sawers, attended seven meetings at the United Nations official on Monday between 11 and Friday February 15 2008. He also participated in a number of bilateral meetings with officials of the United Nations and other delegations on various topics, as part of its activities on conflict situations that fall within the Security Council, the development assistance and UN reform. It was confidential exchanges that can not be disclosed to preserve relations between member states. " |  |
Michael Salla draws this conclusion: "The French Gilles Lorant has never claimed that the meetings on the subject of UFOs, but only that the subject had been broached. FOIA request or the extent confirmed some points Lorant's testimony, acknowledging that Sawers had participated in "confidential bilateral meetings during the period in question."
I had learned and published on February 23 that French was willing to confirm these meetings at the United Nations. Gilles Lorant does not contacted me personally, he had only given the day before at a mutual friend. It is therefore not established that he tried to draw attention to it.
 | And I was given on March 5 a few names of the participants: "The meetings were chaired by Srgjan Kerim, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. There were also English Ambassador and Archbishop Celestino Migliore, permanent representative of the Vatican. " These personalities were present at the United Nations on the dates indicated (even if there had been a mess on the actual participation or only the representation of DSK to the United Nations). The simplest is to consider that he has presented the facts as he went. Otherwise, he could not tell a credible story without having prepared. He mentioned other names, less easily verifiable, like Duval-Hamel ... The problem is that it no longer wishes to come forward. |
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.