Saturday February 9

February 9th, 2008 Posted in February 2008

V onStern, UfoCaseBook on the forum, trying to find an explanation for the events of almost silent 'Drones California':

"It may be that understanding the operation of UAVs is within reach, let alone their origin. The real question is: how those who built have been aware of it? But it may be can never answer. We can not qu'échaffauder theories, which must then be validated, it is a way of approaching reality. Otherwise we will never have the answers. The propulsion system and antigravitation could be to control ... extremely fine particles. such as ions, but to a much wider scale than what is claimed to know today. My theory is that we are dealing with low excited plasmas, confined in metal compartments, by an electromagnetic field to produce continued emissions enough to generate a powerful levitation, regardless of the atmosphere, in an a priori neutral. "He then gave this link which deals with an experiment aboard a space shuttle with a neutron detector, but there is more matter detection that control particle

Garuda following with interest the recent development of Project Camelot: "They are currently focusing on 2012, and the possibility that an event occurred that could threaten our existence. They wonder whether it would be possible to avoid, or at least survive.

Items they have collected so far, consulting a number of people, it is clear that the two main dangers are the emergence of a celestial body (see the side of Henry Deacon) and a reversal of magnetic poles ( see the recent interview of Richard Hoagland). Note that the two events could be combined: a car passing near the Earth could cause a magnetic reversal.

Alienates any invasion is not part of their assumptions ..

In both cases, it would be preferable to keep away from the coast in regions that are somewhat elevated relative to sea level. In a reversal of the poles, it is better not to be poles and the equator. "

Disclosure is it running? Many participants on the forums have noted a backlog of reports of UFO events, the online by several nations of part of their archives ufology, the proliferation of public lectures and television programs on the subject. Even a bustling area?

This excerpt from the recent interview with the American investigator Linda Moulton Howe on Here & Now this could temper enthusiasm:

DDP - "Do you think the U.S. would be in a more favorable in this pre-election years, so that policies are decided to begin the process of Disclosure of the Aliens?"

LMH - "Quite honestly, I think that no government sees no interest in the disclosure. From the perspective of big companies, concerned only to make money, and that leaders who wish above all to maintain their powers ... is to reveal the truth about the aliens would only complicate their lives.

Personally I think the U.S. government - or any other government - sees no advantage. The United States has always led a policy of vilification on these topics, under the pretext of national security, and it dates back at least to the Truman administration in 1947, or sixty years. Absolutely nothing indicates that the current government is ready to tell the truth. "

"In my opinion, the only way to learn that we are not alone in the universe and that other intelligences interested in this planet from perhaps 500 million years, would take these intelligences the initiative to reveal. The question therefore boils down to this: why none of these different types of aliens who have been described and attested by witnesses, military and intelligence services, and who apparently different objectives, has wanted up here prove to the world? Part of the answer is that even the aliens do not want people on this Earth can realize what is happening. "

DDP - "Do you think we can expect a change in attitude after any artifacts discovered by aliens lunar probes launched by Japan, China and soon India?"

LMH - "It is clear that other governments who possess evidence, remain aligned with the U.S. position. The reasons for this behavior are still a mystery to me. "

For its part JakeReason, one of the moderators of Open Minds, summarizes the situation from his point of view: "There are two opposing camps in government and among high U.S. military officials. The pros and antis disclosure.

Intelligence circles realize that it would be difficult to hide much longer reality. It is partly to the number of witnesses involved in hedging. Many of them are now old enough, they have virtually nothing to lose and they intend to share their experiences. The powers that be know that the phenomenon is difficult to control.

In addition, the Internet allows the public to realize that he was often told stories. It is an irreversible event.

Therefore, since at least 1989, governments are engaged in a process of controlled disclosure and are aware of the need acclimatization. We can see an acceleration in the last three years.

Proponents of the Disclosure wish to make a difference and opposite the camp would strengthen its control. But the two sides, we carefully observed the reactions of the public. "

In fact, as Calikid remark: "disclosure would be further complicated if we were to tell us that aliens from the future ..."