Sunday July 1st

July 1st, 2007 Posted in July 2007

A new image was received yesterday by the webmaster UfoCaseBook.com. It is perhaps interesting in the timeline, but its creation seems simplistic. In addition, it is completely anonymous ... 10,538 accords with OnTheFence to comment as follows: "The angle of sunlight and virtually no shadows of the object in the foreground make me doubt. Similarly, there is no shade under the drone. It is possible that the shadow of the object is behind the slight indentation field? In the absence of an original high resolution, I think we should leave it aside. It is doubted that the forgers would be tempted to take the train. "

Whitley Strieber has just introduced its new Editorial, largely dedicated to the symbols of crop-circles, and it suggests that they are experienced as carriers of meditation. Regarding the work of Isaac, it summarizes the three objections:

"The first is the lack of security buffer. However, I happened to see sensitive documents that had been prepared for senior officials of a certain agency, and they did not mark classification. The reason is that in case of leakage, it can deny the source.

The second is that the report provided by Isaac is too light, too net, having been drafted on computer in 1986. This is not true. There were already many machines capable of word processing.

The third objection refers to a viral marketing campaign for a film like Transformers or playing Halo3, or something similar. It could be considered if we only had pictures and written reports. But now we have many witnesses who testified viva voice. Could we imagine a promotion agency has hired actors to deceive Linda Moulton Howe? "

On the forum UfoCaseBook is' ATrueOriginall 'which provides moderation. He noticed a difference between participants, according to accept or reject the origin of alienating work presented by Isaac: "Those who have read a draft of its long text will then return to the forum with mixed feelings, and they may quickly conclude that there would be elements there that unlikely. In contrast, those who have made frequent setbacks, to try to understand, feel to benefit. I am in this case: I carefully read several times, the explanations provided. Now they are embedded deep in my memory and I feel that I have extended my thinking. I now look more against the hoax. "And, as an example, ATrueOriginall us back to read the image of another participant:

CloudBreak: "Our brain is not a holographic substrate, but there are several similarities. The handling capacity of 4 neurons is more than 4 times times the processing power of a single neuron. The brain operates on a non-linear. There is also the fact that neurons are brain areas in different configurations, which gives them different features. "Of course we can not grasp the relevance of the connection that if you read the text of Isaac, published here June 27 ...

The landowners have therefore benefited from the technology? Former astronaut mission Appollo, Dr. Brian O'Leary, in his preface of the recent book by Dr. Greer "Hidden Truth" affirm the same thing. But after Philip Corso and many others.

In the course of his story, Isaac told us that the initiative XPARC in the 80s, was partly inspired proponents of the program CARET (but in its structural aspect). Investigations of Internet users have continued at the site of the company and noted Email Verifier is this sentence:
"After three decades of intensive research on natural language - developing theories founding supported by technological achievements - PARC has accumulated know-how and high performance in the field of natural language. These building blocks allow PARC to intervene at a deeper level, where computers do not deal with that language, but the meaning. "However, this presentation does a technological advance on the man - machine. The track runs short, but this example illustrates, however diversification in the search.

On more general about the signs on the wings of the stage and drones designed for Isaac, I note this remark MarkM on UfoCaseBook forum: "If I had wanted to build a hoax, with such a level of complexity, I created a font that resembles in any way from what exists today. In addition, it would have taken less time to create an original set of characters that modify existing characters. However, there was always someone to notice a resemblance with an existing alphabet. "

Springer, one of the 'owners' of AboveTopSecret considered the attendance statistics of its site, in particular the list of IP sources of consultants: "I can tell you that among our visitors who have not Profile ufologists or marketers. They have the power to punish severely those responsible for leaks.
Just yesterday evening, I saw visitors spend on this forum, conducting their investigation into this case drones, and they are at the highest level of the hierarchy of information, people that are carried out by the U.S. government. " He was surprised, somewhat naively, as the host Internet Isaac was not forced to lock access to their personal pages ... But such a maneuver would generally be considered as proof of authenticity! On the other hand, all equipment was Isaac condoms, placing it on a number of other sites, including this one. So ATS confirmed, unintentionally, that the trail of viral marketing, as well as the assumption of a forger, are no longer valid. Basically, Springer gives the importance extrapolating, because of the authorities to visit the site of ATS does nothing of their intentions.

The Admin Open Minds ironically: "It plays to be afraid and continues to handle her little world. It is quite obvious that what is happening at the moment interest at the highest point people like Ron P. and Kit G. They roam the forums, and they use Dan Smith to be delivered summaries from time to time. It is their role to keep an eye on alternative places like this. "It takes the logical conclusion: Springer does to maintain the suspense and Atis curiosity of its readers because it is a site Enom which displays advertisements, and visitors bring in money (estimated 1 million visits reported $ 2,000).

About money, it is paradoxical that a site déboulonneurs as ATS is making real profits by exploiting the public interest for a pro-ET, the anonymous Isaac - the target of their criticism - initially distributed free of charge ...

A remark CaliKid not seem relevant to those who have read the full text of Isaac: "I just open the latest PC Magazine (July 2007). They titrent on "The Future of IT." One leading east PARC. They propose a new concept of computer networks, where any computer connected can meet the demand for information, rather than a central server. Isaac told us that PACL had inspired the structure of X / PARC. Nowhere was it said that X / PARC has been involved in their research, only a few employees had joined PACL. The idea that technology transfers have taken place between the two companies would be pure speculation. "

The following are "alphabets" of Crop-Circles, compiled over the observations:

Sentinel noted the presence of small metal rings on the cover of Q4-86 Report: "If it is a fake, it requires an extraordinary precision in the details. It means that the document exists physically, and that is not a computer creation. "

"Of course, a forger could have started with digital print its inception, and link pages, before being removed for passing one by one in a scanner. But maybe push a little too far ... Knowing that the report contains images of artifacts, it becomes necessary to ask: is what we practiced this kind of binder in 1986? "

A new false video of 23 seconds, "on how to SaladFingers" now circulating on the Internet ...