Saturday June 30

June 30th, 2007 Posted in June 2007

Research continues on OM, with this proposal illustrated by OnTheFence: "There are only 8 characters rounded, which require a basis for calculating octal. Here is a first approach, in no particular order:

11August had previously reflected on this portion of the planks of Isaac: "I have the impression that these symbols would be used to list a series of specific actions, in conjunction with other symbols, more 'functional' , As instructions ... "

OnTheFence resumed: "Note also, in this excerpt form the arm angles that are related eighths of a circle 90 ° = 2 / 8, 135 ° = 3 / 8. It is possible that the three 'numbers' boxes that you represent the lens (eighth) compared to a reference point. "

For its first appearance on OM, mr772 presents a disturbing reference, he found a video on David Adair - already mentioned here: "At the end of his interview, David Adair refers to the fact that it has components were seen covered entries - each component of each device. He added that the symbols were reversed on opposite sides ... to the left and right. We have perhaps an example on photos transmitted by Isaac. "

This clarification is located 38 minutes early. David Adair explains that he regarded these as signs of serial numbers to identify the parts ...
mr772: "I know that symbols of memory reproduced by Adair does not resemble what we speak here, but I found this very interesting idea reproductive symmetrical."

Regarding research, some have found nothing suspicious found in Google by typing "Caret Palo Alto Laboratory" ... forgetting that this is not the name of the company, but the code name of a program internally. Imagine a unit of CERN in Geneva at the 3rd subsoil, which includes 200 researchers. The draft study will nickname 'Nucleon7' ... and we do not publish their goals but this or on the Internet. Who can wonder then that research in French on the program name does nothing?

The debate comes cyclically on the theme: "CGI, or not?" On ATS, as an amateur in 1111, already singled out for gross negligence, is struggling to monopolize the attention. His motivation is clear and without alternative: "I will be so happy when the hoax has been demonstrated! It will be a back up for me laugh at you! "

Fortunately, very posed, others speak with arguments really technical, and this is the case of srb2001: "I am an artist cgi, and I carefully observed the photographs of artifacts showing Isaac aliens. There is absolutely no evidence of 3D rendering. That is to say that there is no pixel antialiasing on the edges of geometric objects.
Even using the blur filter (Gaussian and grain), which used to move closer to the effect of a photographic image, the contours of the object appear very differently from a digital summary. (...) These objects have been photographed with a traditional SLR type. "

Finish the day with a note of self-mockery, where Razimus says: "As you can see clearly on this picture ..."