Friday, June 8

June 8th, 2007 Posted in June 2007

M urnut concerned at the sight of new images: "The details of the machine are amazing ... I'm starting to wish that it be a trick, the best I have ever seen. Because if it's real, it's very disruptive. "And Colosymphony seeks to understand:" So if this thing came out of nowhere, and suddenly disappeared, because it has a device stealth. This could explain why there is not much evidence that Chad and Raj remain isolated cases. His way of appearing and disappearing is insane! I begin to wonder if these objects appear just long enough for a photo .. Afterwards, "they" get lost. "

There are many talents together on Open Minds. This time it was the turn of the Sentinel to make us appreciate his work: "I made this composite image from three photographs of Stephen. I had posted on three layers and layers I moved up to match the trees. Then I cropped to keep only the ship. The red arrow indicates the direction of rotation. "

CaliKid, meanwhile, compared to the various objects in the back to the same scale, its conclusion is that the gear Chad and / or Rajinder can not be used to compose it. The complexity of the gear is such that Stephen quickly away from the idea of a secret American prototype. Those who were reluctant but still can not consider that we are visited by drones alienates numbers are expected to join the camp of supporters of the CGI, to maintain balance in their value system. The problem is that this new evidence is not easier to find than the previous ones.

Assume a 100% CGI creation: in this case, Jenna and Stephen are pseudos without substance, created by the forger. But it must also have played the Man of Alabama and Chad, and created the character of Rajinder to intervene twice on the OM forum, and to communicate with Admin. It would also have to have inspired the false testimony of Shirley, by pushing to intervene on Coast 2 Coast ... Unless two three artists also gifted, and who do not know, are being delivered to a Technical bidding via the Internet. And Shirley has proved that it was walking in the park Sequoïa, seeing an object that was not designed ...

The author Whitley Strieber is genuinely perplexed: "Before these recent images [Stephen], I thought about human fabrications. But those who have been photographed at Big Basin must be huge. "

"So if it's a hoax, it was brilliantly done, and Chad, Shirley and Mr. Smith - who appear isolated cases, however (and hours of conversations have not led to doubt their word) - would all of them liars and accomplices ..
But what would happen if this is not the case? It is certain that we had never seen such a thing so far. "He evacuated the woman Tahoe, and forgot to mention Rajinder .. A little further, he points to the recovery media: "The drones have not attracted the attention of the media. But if it is a hoax, then they will get coverage. Although this is only partly a kind of special effects, such as the famous' Doug and Dave 'who had claimed some Crop Circles, then it is false that the media will appeal to expose and reality will be obscured. "

At this stage I think it is useful to return to the 'drone' Alabama / 2006 in the series, to continue the comparisons. Similarly, the testimony of Shirley, collected by Linda MH and broadcast on C2C, which seems to have been neglected because it dates back to 2005, must be seen in perspective.

The idea of a promotional campaign for the film "Transformers" - out July 7 in the United States - has resurfaced. But it is difficult to convince. Manteca summarizes: "If a campaign is only for lovers Ovni (s), then I can understand. But the overall impact is totally void global: there is not a person among my friends who had heard of these items .. "

New Morning by Admin OM - who lives in Great Britain: "OK, the contact is established with Jenna & Stephen - To follow. Patience please. "
Still saving for his comments, Brendan did not take the time to tell us whether trade emails and phone .... In the first case, he would have the IP addresses of its correspondents. Finally Ivo5000 said that for once Jenna and Stephen do not write for Yahoo ..

Tomi01UK: "I m'investis particularly in reading this forum, and I visit a few others. I spent all morning to see thousands of images in google images, were combinations of keywords like 'drone', 'drones',' UFO drone 'etc.. After hours of this exercise, it appears that we have a unique phenomenon, compared to the production of game designers, soldiers, artists, the science-fiction ... this configuration is outstanding!
But certainly not forget this image of 1990, taken in Italy we are told, which is archived on the Web for years.
We have a very old image of the object. I tend to think that this is not a hoax, and after waiting with impatience. "

Some observers were surprised to see a lower slats seems broken ... "Sunlight is the same angle at this point," explains OnTheFence, "and most of the pixels of the sky in this area are saturated (nearly 255), so everything here is weakening, but I adjusted the threshold pushing up (255), and it shows us that the "arms is well connected, while the surrounding pixels of the sky is darker, do not connect it altogether. "

OnTheFence the same, a little lesson on the development photographique: "It's just going to show that the dark on the second blurred image, is caused by a horizontal movement of the aircraft, but the point n ' is not so concerned.
I made a horizontal blur (10 = width, height = 1) on some of the trees, and a blur simulated fault developed (10 = width, height = 10) on the same section. The second picture (below) is more in line with a horizontal blur. "

"This is an exercise that does not prove much. One can observe the same kind of vague on the subject, which suggests that the central ring is rotating, but this is probably a blur. "

There is even a "AgentMulder on OM! "Have you noticed that this complex phenomenon such as crop circles ...? They started with simple forms and then saw things much more sophisticated ... "

The lack of EXIF data on the images of Big Basin has already been justified yesterday by another photographer (practice, it seems, not to reveal his' tips'). Redman042 - which obviously did not read -- wanted to come back, "Why that would have given much trouble to make a fake photo, fearing it reveal its EXIF data? Is it not possible to superimpose others? If I was a forger, and that I spend all day tinkering with a machine CG, to convince Ufologues that it is a real machine, I would certainly place also in the EXIF info, I do let not the white. It seems strange. The only explanation for me is that so unintentional data have been removed at the time to reduce the weight of the images before publishing them. "

One explanation may be more advanced comes from JimKrypto, which uses software Exif: "I have observed how the site CaseBook dealt UFO images in general on their site, they never leave the EXIF data shows ... They usually treat the photographs sent to them, rename them, and intentionally or not, to remove such information. "

OnTheFence embarked on a new study: "I have watched more closely antennas to see if there was a shock at this point ... These antennas show a ratio blue: red / green as on the images of Chad, which is also what we see on the images of lightning storms. The blue component is more intense than red or green near the antennas, while down, the difference is not as sensitive. RGB Histogram See below: "

- CaliKid: "You want to talk about chromatic aberration ..."

- OnTheFence: "I conducted in phases, from top to bottom antennas. Chromatic aberrations would have revealed uniformémnt, or one that sees them top of the antenna. "

- CaliKid: "It confirms shooting real rather than a manufacturing CGI?"

- OnTheFence: "Not necessarily, but it is quite difficult to achieve. Beware, do not forget that images are Basin. Jpgs very compressed. "

- Sentinel: "It's not very complicated. Just move a few bits of one or two of the RGB channels on one side, depending on the effect you want to give. "

For me, I'm not sure that a forger would have been possible to include chromatic aberrations, only the upper part of antennas ...

The new expected Admin we are transmitted by Ivo5000: "This is the first email Jenna us:"

From Jenna L ***
A: bren***. com
Date of transmission: Friday June 8 2007 4:03 AM
Subject: FW: Images of the vessel Etrange Saratoga, CA, taken yesterday, Doc attached.

Hi!
Webmaster UFO casebook me that you are a writer, and you want to communicate with me and probably also with Stephen. It is best placed to speak, of course, since it was there. ^ _ ^

He is happy with the next exchange, in fact I was more committed than expected in this case, because my goal was initially to make contact with the right people. Here is his email address: ***@***. com. You'll probably many things to tell you!

I do you follow the original email I sent to UFO casebook, with the idea that it could contribute to your story.
Jenna "

Note that Brendan, Forum Administrators OM, has promoted its status as an editor, because it has several major themes synthesise ufologiques AmericanChronicle.com on the site.

There is no question of publishing the precise coordinates of Jenna and / or Stephen, but Ivo5000 tells us: "Their IP addresses are different, they correspond to the Central California. In other words, they stick with the story. "