Tuesday June 5

June 5th, 2007 Posted in June 2007

W hoopeddog: "Let me a stupid question: Has anyone thought only to contact the Police Capitola, whether the subject of Rajinder had been reported around May 16?" Actually, nobody to my knowledge has made this simple approach ... Everyone was too busy to discuss dropping his phone. But TheShadow reassures us: "The Admin has occupied today. It awaits an answer. "Today only three weeks later!

Proponents of the object photographed in flight are found in about 10,538:

"1) For me the images are real. My eye is exercised to detect forgeries. Of course, the CGI is commonly used by Hollywood for special effects that cost millions of dollars. It goes quite well in film because the tricks are animated, which prevents us from analyzing precisely. But again I do know the difference. Show me such a still image from the film "The 300", I could immediately see the CGI. Photos by Chad and Raj are authentic. That's why experts CG never able to take them into default, because they are real.

2) We have reports from multiple witnesses.

3) This object is unique. It is asymmetrical. A forger would we merely replicate a UFO classic. Do you think the counterfeiters are as smart? No author of science fiction professional has described a device with such features as realistic.

What is this hoax which you speak? If it was a fake, tell me why a forger would have given so hard ... To get ufology? Probably not, because ufology did nothing to do, apparently. "

Regence, which had so far reported as a determined opponent to the theory of the real gear, has changed its board since the 'discovery' of 'new' images: "If I was a forger, I would probably not published high-resolution images! "Indeed, even screen on a TV giant photos of Rajinder well take the road.

Emkay has just joined the forum OM: "I note that people here are very competent, that produce a considerable analytical work, while others have repeatedly: 'This is a hoax, unless the witness appears. When a witness became known, they said: "It's a hoax, unless it responds to questions before that date. The witness answered questions. But that was not enough: 'This is a hoax, unless it responds to such a question. I understand the need not to leave, but it seems to me that some ideas have made and are not really 'open'. "

Two hours after the images in high definition Rajinder have been made available, the Flickr account was the subject of an attack, but wonder if the culprit is an observer of OM. The strange object is now replaced by a porn video, signed "dEEEEEEEz Nutz" (a signature hiphop). The site Flickr has finally removed the Rajman1977. Basically, it was not the purpose of the hacker?

The availability of images in Capitola High Resolution revived the work, leading by example Tridi to produce this new study 3D:

For its part, Spf33 produced a new animation with images Transparency between 13 and 14, the first from the second match in 22 sequences:

The placement of an insert in the local press has progressed. Kana, who lives near Santa Cruz, replied: "I think a format 3/20ème should suffice. Oops, I have no landline phone, and I just lost my notebook. We will have to find a volunteer to receive calls, and filter jokers.
Let us provide an email address? Perhaps we should speak openly on the forum ...
I am informed of the arrangements for publication, and I wish you aware ... "

Illuminati, which rarely intervenes since December 2006, is contributing: "I am a professional working in Photoshop, with 15 years experience (since version 3), and I have a good practice of editing and photo - mounting. I am convinced that these pictures of Capitola are extremely difficult to produce, assuming that is possible. You can make a 3D model, complete with the Maya or other software, you can animate, and apply all kinds of effects ( 'motion blur') and others. - But it still leave identifiable traces. Tell me if I am wrong, but I do not see anything like this in these images, including those that are blurred ... I think Saladfingers could tell us more about the special effects in 3D (it falls under my domain) ...
In conclusion - I do not doubt that these images are real. And in case I am wrong, I would be willing to change jobs. At least I take a refresher ... "

A few hours earlier, we Spf33 reported that he had shown the same images of Capitola to a dozen of his colleagues, all professional digital imaging, either in advertising, fashion, film or internet - no n Has been able to default.